2018/11/24托福独立写作范文：When your supervisor or teacher assigned you to work on a new project with people who think differently than you and do things differently. Whether it is more effective or to find anybody you wish in the group.
1. better personal development
a. 人际交往能力 和不同想法的人工作会锻炼人际交往能力，对不同的人选取不同的沟通技巧，交流自己的看法，而想法一样的人不需要选取新的人际交往技巧，因为并不能锻炼人际交往能力。
b. 坚持不懈 和不同想法的人工作在一起工作，当遇到困难的时候可以受到不同人的鼓舞坚持不懈，而想法一样很可能会一起放弃。
2. higher efficiency
a. 更好的发现错误 和不同想法的人更能从不同方面去看问题，从而更好的发现错误。
b. 减少时间 想法不同的人可以分工，根据每个人的特点分配任务，从而减少任务完成的时间。而想法相同的人们在一起通常需要一起想解决办法。
Having a glimpse of thecurrent groups or teams in various industries, we may marvel at the fact that differentleaders have their own strategy to build their own teams. Some leaders preferto choose group members they like or appreciate, while others tend to only keepthose with different ideas or opinions. If you ask me which way is more effective,I would definitely share my support with the latter one.
First and foremost, fewwould disagree with the fact that there are no perfect or omnipotent leaders,which means even a most successful leader could not deal with everything in atask or think up every solution when problems come up. It is entirely possiblethat a leader may run out of innovative ideas at some stage. At this moment, hewill need a group member who can think differently to help him by devoting somenew ideas or solutions. Taking Ma Huateng, the founder of Tencent Co. as anexample, we may find that when QQ faced a big crisis with the uprising ofFacebook and other forms several years ago, Ma Huateng, as the leader, had no solutionto save the previous prosperity of QQ until one of his employee proposed a newform of chatting online, which is Wechat. After adopting the suggestion of thisgroup member, Ma Huateng managed to make Wechat the most popular communicativetool in China. That is to say, this successful leader would never achieve sucha bigger success without the different idea of his group member.
Moreover, there is nodenying the fact that having group members with different opinions is aneffective way of keeping the leader from becoming a tyranny. Imagine that aleader only chooses people he like to be his group member, then all of themembers would just listen to his words with no courage to make any valuableadvices. Then the whole group would become a team of obedient “servants”. Wouldthis kind of group last very long? The answer is definitely negative. Let usnot forget how Hitler dug up his own grave by sticking to his Fascism ideologywithout any group member who can speak up differently. He was the typical leaderwho only chose the group members he liked and never listened to the members’opinions. That is the reason why his empire went into ashes so fast.
Admittedly, some wouldargue that if the group is full of members who hold conflictive ideas comparedwith the leader’s, how could such a group unite together to develop itself?More specifically, would it be possible that the leader would be busy atsolving conflicts all the time? From this point, it could be dangerous if aleader chooses some members with totally different ideas. However, it must beacknowledged that a qualified leader should be capable of recognizing whetherthe different ideas of the group members should be adopted or not. In otherwords, a successful leader can take valuable suggestions from his group membersfrom time to time while eliminating unnecessary conflicts or useless ideas atthe same time. Without this ability, the leader can not be qualified as oneindeed.
In conclusion, it is much more reasonable tokeep group members with different ideas for a leader even though sometimes itmight be kind of difficult to deal with these opinions. At least, no one wouldwant a leader who is a total tyranny who only choose and trust the people helikes.