2016年6月25日托福独立写作范文：What is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of environmental problems?
1. fund researches on new energy sources such as solar and wind power;
2.protect forests and natural wildlife species.
3. pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution. (16.06.25)
Nowadays, human beings are facing more challenges and environmental issues, such as the scarcity of traditional energy sources, global warming, and pollution as well. Some people believe that the primary task for the government is to invest more on researching new energy sources, such as solar and wind power; whereas others argue that protecting forests and natural wildlife species should be the government’s top priority. To my understanding, the most important action for the government to take to protect our environment is to pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution.
Indeed, in order to protect the environment, funding research studies on new energy sources is important because the pervasion of clean energy could help reduce the emission of waste gas and other types of pollution in the future. However, scientific research usually takes years or even decades. It will be too late to make use of those scientific achievements if the problem of pollution continues to become too severe to solve. Similarly, protecting forests and natural wildlife species cannot solve the most urgent problem of pollution either. Though the government should spend money and effort on forests and wildlife preserves as a long-term practice to protect the earth, this action cannot handle the most serious pollution problem immediately.
In fact, the main cause of the pollution problem’s threatening our life is that there lacks strong laws and supervisions to reduce the pollution. In order to minimize the amount of pollution, the most urgent need is to enforce laws and make sure that large-scale industries and individuals follow the laws. Take the air pollution in Beijing for example. Beijingers have been suffering from the haze, also known as PM 2.5 for a long time. According to a recent survey, the haze is mainly caused by the waste gas emission from vehicles and large-scale industries in areas surrounding the city. If there could be laws and supervisions to limit the number of cars and the amount of waste that factories are allowed to produce per day, I believe that the air pollution problem could be solved to a large extent, which definitely contributes the most to our environment, at least for now.
Based on the above discussion, the most important action for the government to take to protect our environment is to pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution.
Taking a panoromic view of human history, we canreadily find that the natural environment plays anenormously important role in determing the futureof each and every country. Given the greatsignificance of clean environment, the generalpublic as well as the governors begin to wonderwhich is the most essential action to protect theenvironment, among funding new energy research, preserving natural habitat or enacting strict laws. Towards such a long-running tug-of-war, Iam inclined to argue that national governments should invest financial support in developingnew energy sources.
Initially, spending more money in discovering new energy can radically solve the variousenvironmental problems. As is common sense, the deteriorating environment is the result ofthe overexploitation of fossil fuels, including coal, oil and natural gas. To be specific, numerous chemical plants usually burn the coal to provide power for manufacturing all kindsof goods designed to satisfy the basic needs of the general public. As a result, a large amountsof industrial wastes are discharged to take a toll on the natural environment. Also, anincreasing number of petrol-powered automobiles will definitely emit car exhause(e.g. fumesand toxic gas), which can increase the likelihood of the public suffering from respiratorydiseases. All the above problems related to environment can be resolved by find new andclean energy like solar energy, wind power and tidal power. Undoubtedly, replacing thetraditional energy with the new ones can dramatically decrease the pollution andcontamination, thus leading to a better living environment. For example, once the cars usesthe electricity instead of petrol, the air quality will improve to a large extent.
Secondly, there are conspicuous limitation of the other two options. As for preserving naturalplaces, the effect of this practice is relatively restricted. To illustrate, the traditional energysources are usually exploited and discovered in the natural places. Consequently, thepreservation of natural places will hinder the access to various energy and thus impede theprogress of the whole society. Also, the same logic applies to passing laws to reducepollution. It is an indisputable fact that across the globe, many countries now are heavielydependent on the industries and factories which produce pollutions. In other words, once thelaw of punishing these companies is enforced, these corporation may have to cut down theiroutput and make less profits, even ending up going bankcrupt. Accordingly, the nationaleconomy and the living standard of the public will suffer too.
Factoring what has been discussed above, we can conclude that funding research ofenvironmental friendly energy will be more preferable, because finding proper alternativeenergy is the key to solving the environmental problems comprehensively.